Monday, September 25, 2017

Faul is "always going to identified by [his] real name, ALSO 'Paul McCartney.'"


Faul is constantly dropping hints that he is not the real Paul McCartney. At 9:25 in the video below, Faul tells Geraldo Rivera, "I'm always going to be identified by my real name, ALSO 'Paul McCartney.'"



This is just one of many slips/admissions Faul has made over the years that he is not the real deal.

Tina Foster, Esq. 



19 comments:

  1. Yeah it amazes me, From an insider perspective they probably all know he's not the real Paul, yet the fix is on... I can't get enough on this topic...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Has anyone seen the Dec. 28, 2014 Jimmy Fallon show with Faul? Jimmy says to him, "You do a great Paul McCartney. You do the best Paul McCartney impersonation ever!" https://youtu.be/m_zf6kYvR8k

    ReplyDelete
  3. I entered a URL on my previous post, but I just checked it, and the video is no longer available.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So easy to spot the real beatles from the imposters.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ue9NI7nenf8

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5HiqCxBegw

    ReplyDelete
  5. All original Beatles here - certified by me.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fk0sY_WiCpA

    ReplyDelete
  6. Certified Real Beatles -

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY5jVMrNQSY

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wMAGno07_-8

    ReplyDelete
  7. Very obvious Paul had a natural and true sense of humor Faul never possessed.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etDPmv8hR7k

    ReplyDelete
  8. Another clue I just noticed on the Beatles VEO channel on YouTube, "The Beatles Real Love." At 3:55, it shows Faul (apparently in India) playing the guitar right-handed! No one can say this is a "flipped image" faked by PIDers.

    ReplyDelete
  9. What are your thoughts on Patrick Scrivener? His research and work is similar to yours although he takes it a step further by claiming all four Beatles were replaced at the same time. "The Beatles were Titanized". Is his catch phrase. He has a web site with what I deem as credible research and facts about his claim. I do know that you also delve into this theory as well, with the John Lennon comparison, but just how far do you go with it? TY.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I came to the same conclusion that all 4 Beatles were replaced. I have talked about that on some of my radio interviews.

      Delete
    2. Agreed. Paul was the first, John next, George and Ringo not sure who was next. This guy playing Ringo with the constant peace sign is a fraud just like Faul playing JPM is a fraud. This was a hostile takeover for sure. Just like the current Weinstein takeover is nothing more than one powerful group taking over another playing dirty all the way. If you think hostile takeovers take place in boardrooms and cornering shareholder stock then you need to watch the Godfather and project that into Wall Street, London, Hong Kong and the like.

      Delete
    3. Please, I would love to hear more about the theory that all four Beatles were replaced. My mind has been blown!

      Delete
  10. Here's a signal piece on how it works. BTW - I don't believe for a second Brian Epstein died of an overdose he was just told he had to move on, he lived on for sure. Furthermore I think Sir Faul is Jewish. Powerful Jewish RARELY marry outside the tribe. Faul is 3 for 3. Yes I think Heather Mills is Jewish too.


    http://jewishworldnews.org/paul-mccartney-jew-ish-beatle/

    Here’s the rundown. McCartney’s first wife was the Jewish Linda Eastman, not part of the George Eastman family of Eastman-Kodak fame in Rochester, N.Y. She was born in New York City and grew up in the Scarsdale area of Westchester County. She graduated from Scarsdale High School in 1959.

    Her father was born Leopold Vail Epstein, the son of Jewish-Russian immigrants, who later changed his name to Lee Eastman. He was an entertainment lawyer who represented McCartney after the Beatles’ long-time manager, Brian Epstein, died in 1967 of an accidental drug overdose. McCartney’s choice of his father-in-law as manager was famously opposed by fellow Beatle John Lennon, who favored the former Rolling Stones manager Allen Klein (also Jewish). The dispute over management of the Beatles, """which pitted a Jewish lawyer against a Jewish accountant""", became a major factor in the ultimate dissolution of the Fab Four. Linda Eastman’s brother, John Eastman, later took over from his father and remained McCartney’s manager and attorney for many years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Before he married the last one he dated Rosanne Arquette, which prompted me to pursue the same line of reasoning.

      Delete
  11. Did I read a guy named Maxwell handled the Beatles for mi5 and didn't Maxwells silver hammer came down upon his head and Maxwells silver hammer made sure that he was dead. Is this after the car crash to finish off injured Paul. A deal with the illuminati silver being the metal of the moon cult illuminati. And to represent it symbolically Crowley at the funeral on the Sgt. Peppers album.cover.

    ReplyDelete
  12. As you know historical documents today regarding the JFK assassination were released today. The assassination of JFK and the elimination of JPM and the original Beatles are woven and bound together, their source of demise is the same evil criminal legion. The perpetrators are one in the same. If you don't get that then you are missing the overall. We need to defeat them by exposing them. Think about it April 27, 1961 and here we are in 2017. We have no leaders it's up to us.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCfRxIOa0hc

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So true. I came to the PID, for the 2nd time I was a child in '67 and was ware of the original PID phenom, by way of my niece. And though I was on-board with JFK, 811 and was an avid researcher into alternative news, I wasn't ready for PID to be true. It was too personal. But when I matched my transition from adoring JPM as a little girl to finding him and music ridiculous, I was able to see that indeed he had been replaced. So many decades had passed since even considered JPM. Most recently I would mused about strangely he'd aged because of extensive plastic surgery, giving him a "grandmotherly" appearance. His music was pablem, saccharine and annoying. After reading the Italian forensic study I realized that my reactions to a once beloved singer were the best proof. And once you know the degree of manipulation and control that is placed upon a l of us, You realize that the Beatles and the culture that that they ushered in couldn't thrive outside of the control system. Let alone achieve that level of success and influence.

      Delete
  13. Thought the 'all 4 were replaced' to be a bit of a stretch to be honest, but was watching your I/v with Jim Fetzer - I think it was your first with all the images that clearly show Faul for who he is, when opposite on the YouTube bar was a collection of 'Photos of the Beatles by Elena' (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCH9JepAkpJsF07XoZaxO1bQ).
    Are you aware of it? Huge body of work of photos/video etc that have all been posted this year- and after watching several of them I think you may be right!

    Unbelievable collection of photos of very obvious doubles, mixed in with originals, lots very grainy but clearly not the Fab Four but others even in successive frames clearly different people. It is an absolute mind f*** of the highest calibre.

    There is video of the 'making of Hey Jude' with Faul and a new skinny faced, bespectacled John and original sounding talking and singing overlayed with some very dodgy vocals. Look at the one with the photos with Muhammad Ali in 1964 at 3.11 it looks like Ringo and definitely John have had their profiles altered - John so bad it's funny - giving him the elongated hooked nose he seemed to suddenly develop but at 4.20 he's back to normal !
    In California in August 66 the b/w Paul is shown to be hairy and in the two colour shots he isn't. This very strange but equally obvious juxtaposition seems to be evident in most that I have viewed so far.
    There is a lifetime of work looking at this lot I tell you. Someone has gone to a LOT of trouble putting these together.
    Have fun, P.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I didn't even get to the 9:25 mark before I noticed that some of the closeup videos of Paul are weird. His eyes don't always move in synch with his face, as though someone went back and popped the eyes in later. All the video is grainy, but everyone else's eyes are moving along with their faces. Major and consistent blurring of the outer corners of his mouth, as well, no matter which way he turns. Also noticed the big GREY ear facing us during some of the concert footage. Finally, this is the first time I've seen any of the Pauls wearing braces. The only other Paul sighting I recall where he has these large spaces between his teeth is a still from the India trip.

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for your comments. They will appear once they have been approved.